For organizations that want to lead—not follow—in responsible AI. We help you build accountability into your systems from the start, ensuring they genuinely serve human wellbeing, not just meet minimum requirements.
We partner with organizations deploying AI systems where accountability matters—from regulated industries to high-stakes decision-making contexts.
Regulated industries including healthcare, financial services, and government agencies
High-stakes AI systems affecting hiring, lending, benefits, or resource allocation
Procurement and vendor management teams evaluating AI tools, partners, and integrators
Leadership teams committed to ethical AI, not just regulatory compliance
Pre-Launch: Before deploying AI systems to production or major updates
Regulatory Pressure: When facing scrutiny or anticipating new requirements
Issue Response: After concerns about bias, fairness, or transparency emerge
Third-Party Due Diligence: When procuring, onboarding, or auditing AI vendors, partners, and integrators
As an AI research and consultancy firm, we help forward-thinking organizations embed accountability into their AI systems—whether you're building in-house or procuring from vendors. Our comprehensive assessments evaluate bias, fairness, transparency, and genuine human impact across your entire AI ecosystem, ensuring your systems enhance rather than diminish human dignity and wellbeing.
Ensure your AI systems treat all people equitably. We assess algorithmic bias across protected characteristics and help you build fairness into your systems from the ground up.
Evaluate how well your AI systems can explain their decisions, ensuring users understand why outcomes occur and can meaningfully contest them.
Assess data collection, storage, and usage practices to ensure they respect user privacy and maintain appropriate data governance standards.
Our signature service: evaluating how AI systems affect human dignity, autonomy, and wellbeing. We help you build AI that genuinely cares for humans—not just meets regulatory minimums.
Stay ahead of regulations while building systems you're proud of. We help you exceed compliance requirements—EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and emerging global standards.
Get a clear path forward. We provide prioritized recommendations with actionable steps to strengthen accountability and improve human impact—not just check boxes.
Make informed decisions about AI vendors, partners, and integrators. We provide independent, objective assessments of third-party AI systems to help you understand risks, ensure accountability, and maintain control over your AI ecosystem—whether you're procuring new solutions, onboarding partners, or conducting due diligence on existing vendors.
Our methodology combines rigorous technical analysis with deep understanding of human values. We don't just audit what you've built—we help you build systems you can be proud of.
We understand your AI system's purpose, impact goals, and organizational context—ensuring our assessment aligns with your values and business objectives.
Comprehensive evaluation of models, algorithms, training data, and decision-making processes using both automated tools and expert human judgment.
Our signature assessment: how your system affects users' dignity, autonomy, and wellbeing. We identify where your AI genuinely cares for humans—and where it falls short.
We help you build ongoing accountability mechanisms—not just one-time compliance checks. This includes governance structures, monitoring systems, and decision frameworks.
Clear, prioritized recommendations with implementation guidance. We help you build AI systems worthy of trust—not just pass regulatory reviews.
Examples of what our accountability assessments uncover
A healthcare AI system claimed to be unbiased because it didn't use race as a feature. Our assessment revealed proxy discrimination through zip codes and historical access patterns—resulting in systematically worse recommendations for minority populations. The technical audit passed; the human impact assessment didn't.
A lending algorithm provided explanations for decisions, meeting explainability requirements. But our user comprehension testing revealed borrowers couldn't actually understand or contest the reasoning—explanations were technically accurate but practically useless. True transparency requires human comprehension, not just model outputs.
An employment screening system flagged candidates for "attitude issues" based on facial expressions during video interviews. While not explicitly biased by protected class, our Human Impact Assessment identified dignity violations—judging character from involuntary microexpressions. No regulation addresses this; ethics demands it.
Examples are illustrative composites based on common patterns in AI deployments, not specific client engagements.
Every engagement delivers concrete, actionable outputs—not vague recommendations.
We assess your AI systems against leading ethical frameworks and regulatory standards to ensure comprehensive compliance and best practices.
Most AI services focus on checking compliance boxes. We help you build systems you're proud of—AI that genuinely serves human wellbeing and demonstrates leadership in responsible innovation.
We evaluate what others miss: how AI affects human dignity, autonomy, and genuine wellbeing. Our assessments help you build systems that serve humanity—not just pass audits.
We understand how AI intersects with organizational culture, human behavior, and social context. We identify systemic issues before they become public failures.
Our approach is grounded in cutting-edge research in AI ethics, cognitive science, and human-centered design—not just regulatory checklists.
While others stop at bias metrics, we've developed a proprietary framework that evaluates AI systems across dignity preservation, autonomy impact, and wellbeing outcomes. This includes analyzing decision points where AI might undermine human agency, assessing emotional labor imposed on users, and identifying dignity violations that regulations don't capture.
We assess AI in organizational context, not in isolation. This means examining how AI interacts with existing power structures, workflow patterns, and human decision-making processes. We've identified failure modes in AI deployments that purely technical audits miss—like systems that technically "work" but erode trust or create perverse incentives.
Our assessments don't just check current compliance. We analyze proposed regulations, enforcement patterns, and emerging standards to identify requirements 12-24 months out. Organizations that work with us avoid the scramble when new rules drop—because we've already flagged the gaps.
Every Neveli engagement is led by senior practitioners with hands-on experience building, deploying, and evaluating AI systems at scale. No junior staff, no rotating teams, no cookie-cutter frameworks. You work directly with the experts who understand both the technical depth and human implications of AI accountability.
Founded on the principle that AI systems should enhance rather than diminish human dignity, we combine rigorous technical analysis with ethical depth. Our work is informed by years of experience across AI development, deployment, and evaluation—ensuring assessments that are both technically sound and genuinely focused on human impact.
We tailor access requirements to your security constraints. Meaningful assessments can be conducted using documentation, API outputs, and system behavior analysis. For deeper technical reviews, all work is performed under NDA with appropriate security controls. We've worked with highly regulated organizations requiring air-gapped environments.
Our goal is improvement, not punishment. Findings are delivered confidentially with practical remediation paths. We work collaboratively with your team to address issues before they become crises. Many organizations engage us precisely because they want honest assessment—not validation.
Absolutely. We provide independent third-party assessments of vendor AI systems, partner solutions, and integrator implementations. Whether you're conducting due diligence before procurement, verifying vendor claims, or auditing existing third-party systems, our objective evaluations help you understand risks, ensure compliance, and make informed decisions about your AI ecosystem. Many organizations use our assessments as part of their vendor management and procurement processes.
Yes. We provide detailed methodology documentation, sample deliverables, and can respond to formal RFP requirements. Our assessments meet the documentation standards required by government procurement and large enterprise vendor management processes.
We offer retainer-based advisory for continuous accountability. This includes quarterly reviews, policy updates as regulations evolve, team training, and pre-deployment assessments for new features. Think of it as an accountability function without hiring full-time headcount.
We actively monitor regulatory developments across jurisdictions—EU AI Act, US executive orders, sector-specific rules. Our assessments are forward-looking: we flag not just current gaps but emerging requirements so you're ahead of compliance deadlines, not racing to catch up.
No overhead, no junior staff learning on your dime, no cookie-cutter frameworks. Our team brings hands-on experience building and evaluating AI systems, not just reviewing documentation. Combined with our Human Impact Assessment, you get both technical rigor and ethical depth that traditional audits miss.
Let's discuss how we can help you build AI systems worthy of trust—systems that genuinely serve human wellbeing while positioning you as a leader in your industry.
Let's discuss your AI system and what accountability means for your organization. We'll explore whether this is the right fit and outline a tailored approach.
Get in TouchNeed independent evaluation of a third-party AI system? We'll provide objective assessment of vendor claims, risks, and accountability—before you commit.
Request Assessment
Confidentiality & Data Protection
All engagements conducted under strict NDA. Your proprietary information, model architectures, and assessment findings remain confidential. We maintain appropriate security controls and can accommodate data residency requirements for regulated industries.
Typical engagement timeline: 4-8 weeks for comprehensive assessment | 2-3 weeks for focused review
Work authorization: Available for government and private sector engagements globally